Вальсальва

I didn't go over all comments (language) but for me:
1. on first film - gif2 is typical sign to constriction: ventricular septum flattening on inspirarion !
2. Typical to constricion amplitude difference both in RV and LV inflow and tissue doppler
3. Is there not right ventricle / right atrium puncture ? What is the RV / RA elektrode stim. treshold and impedance ?

xyz. Atrial electrode seems to be out of border

This is my patient that was operatet because of constriction (panser heart)

In addition ekg shows only RV stimulation. P waves go independently = Atrial electrode malfunction.
This confirms my diagnosis of RA puncture - perikard hematoma - infection - constrictive pericarditis ....
I had patient wich was in sinus rytm and was wrongly sat on VVI PM modus and produced giant TR and RV heart failure. After changing to DDDR TR normalised and HF dissapeared !!!! I think in this case Right Heart Failure was bi-factorial - constiction plus RA elektrode malfunction with A-V dyssynchrony and TR

P-P = 640ms R-R = 800ms neither A sensing or pacing

This is example from my collection of patient with secundar tricuspid regurgitation caused by PM syndrom. Stimulation in VVI in patient with sinus rythm. First avi is taken one day after PM was shifted from VVIR to DDDR Unfortunately I havn’t registrerd echo from admission. Second avi is registered 7 days after… On admission she was in heavy hemodynamic state : Ortopnoe, lungsoedem on rtg and heavy edematous

Is there not right ventricle / right atrium puncture ?

Atrial electrode seems to be out of border

Absolutely right. We have changed RA lead with some new effusion after procedure. CT and arrhythmology-lab data confirmed one another.

In addition ekg shows only RV stimulation. P waves go independently = Atrial electrode malfunction. I think in this case Right Heart Failure was bi-factorial - constiction plus RA elektrode malfunction with A-V dyssynchrony and TR

Thank you for your attention, it's pleasure for me) Diuretics gave much more effect than lead change, but you right abt pacemaker syndrome.

А вы не повторили исследование после замены электрода?

Beg your pardon for intrusion. Not a cardiologist. But the suggestion of Dr. Hertz about RA puncture (not a vague "дислокация", but the complete perforation) by the lead seems to be too good to keep silent. This explains the whole picture. Both TR and constriction, and sepsis. Indeed, except for the control examination, it seems that there no "grey zone" remains.
PS Interstingly enough, what is Mr."Neofit's" view. Is he delighted with Dr.Hertz's explanation?

А вы не повторили исследование после замены электрода?

Повторили сразу после того как извлекли электрод, перфорировавший стенку сердца) И еще несколько раз позже.

If there is still constriction patient needs operation. One must not be ashamed or hesitate. Blood is known from his action in pericardium to form pericard constriction. Puncture must not give dramatic symptoms. Electrode tip can "be born" outside the human body borders as the first symptom to perforation !! ) I can find picture of it if one wants to

Было бы интересно увидеть как стали выглядеть потоки на ТК, МК и в ПВ на нормальном ритме(синусовом, назвязанном предсердном), есть ли atrial notch на при исследовании МЖП в М-режиме и если есть ПН и был записан ее спектр тоже хотелось бы увидеть.

Perforated lead 1 :

Perforated lead 2 :

Perforated lead 3